Welcome to Tech-O-Buzz…

May 26, 2010

Microsoft to Sales Partners: Sell Hyper-V Along with VMware

Filed under: Computers,Microsoft,Technology — techobuzz @ 9:35 am
Tags: , ,

Courtesy: Virtualization Review

Nice find by Alessandro Perilli at Virtualization.info. He came up with a “call-to-action” written by David Greschler, Microsoft director of Virtualization, that appeared on the company’s partner network channel, and talked about the strong competition VMware is throwing at Hyper-V. Bottom line: Despite the heaping helpings of hype, Hyper-V is not capturing the hearts, minds, or pocketbooks of Microsoft’s sales partners at the expense of VMware.

That swishing sound you hear is VMware CEO Paul Maritz rubbing his hands together with glee.

In support of Microsoft’s new “Virtualization Partner Profitability Toolkit,” Greschler begins, “Every partner knows about the great opportunity to sell virtualization technology and services. For a while, that meant one thing: working exclusively with VMware.

“Times have changed.”

Greschler goes on to cite the relative affordability and technical prowess of Hyper-V compared to VMware, while noting that IDC says Hyper-V “continued its ascent” in Q4 09, growing 215% year over year.

But then the tenor changes dramatically when he goes on to declare: “Nearly every VMware partner we talk to recognizes that Microsoft is a major player in virtualization and tells us they would like an opportunity to build a virtualization practice that includes both VMware and Microsoft.”

While this is not tantamount to raising a white flag, it is a stark, public acknowledgement of VMware’s deeply embedded pre-eminence.

The Virtualization Partner Profitability Toolkit, which is available on the Microsoft Partner Network, includes a “profitability modeling tool” in the form of a interactive spreadsheet designed to depict the advantages of adding a Microsoft practice to their business.

So what will Microsoft partners find if they dutifully use this tool? According to Greschler, “As much as we’d like to tell you otherwise, if you plug the numbers in to look at your work on a project-by-project basis, the numbers could favor VMware. But if you take a practice-level view, and look at the numbers over the long term, the tool is likely to show partners making far more money with Microsoft.”

The company says that claim is true because Microsoft virtualization offerings are “three-to-five times” less than VMware, a claim that VMware would hotly dispute, arguing that while Hyper-V is free, customers have to buy it along with an operating system, and they have to manage it, neither of which occurs free of charge.

At any rate, in conclusion, Greschler declares, “The takeaway from all this is pretty simple. If you’re just selling VMware today, then you are in the VMware business. If you want to be in the virtualization business, look at building a virtualization practice where you’re technology-agnostic and offering more choice to customers.”

If you are one of those customers, you probably won’t be hearing this particular call to action.


1 Comment »

  1. I don’t trust those numbers from IDC, Gartner or anyother paid Microsoft analytical firm. Those numbers are totally bogus. VMWare will remain on top simply because it works across all server operating systems as oppose to MS Hyper-V which will only fully work under a Windows Server. Again more vendor-lock in from Microsoft. Yes Hyper-V is free but what about Windows Servers are they free nope not at all. Have you looked at what cost to get the version of SQL server? Is insane and let’s not mention Windows Server 2008(Crazy) exactly for what?

    So the trick is All Windows servers or you don’t get to play with our software. Sure they deployed some Linux specific code for their Hyper-V but some folks in the FOSS community say that it does not work very well on Linux. This is critical because in most IT Server rooms you have both Windows and Linux servers. And I really doubt this is going to change if anything some IT folks would rather dump their Windows servers all together. So I think VMWare has nothing to worry about.

    Comment by reya276 — May 26, 2010 @ 11:22 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: